Environmental health groups are looking to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to impose tougher standards on fluoride in drinking water, building on a decision Friday by the federal Department of Health and Human Services to lower the recommended level for the first time in nearly 50 years.
The HHS move came in the wake of a government study showing that about 2 out of 5 adolescents have tooth streaking or spottiness because of excessive fluoride. In extreme cases, teeth can become pitted. (side note from friendsofwater: this totally contradicts claims from the initial studies saying this would be a rare problem. Gee, maybe some of the other claims may not be true too! Do YOU think damaging the teeth of 40% of our youth is okay?)
The dangers may go beyond cosmetic issues. The EPA released two new reviews of research on fluoride Friday. One study found that prolonged, high intake of fluoride can increase the risk of brittle bones, fractures and crippling bone abnormalities. (another side note: this has actually been well understood for decades. fluoride has a negative effect on calcium bonding – this is not news.)
It is our impression that the tide is just beginning to turn on the question of fluoridation in the water. The April 12th issue of Time Magazine included fluoride on a list of “The Hazards Lurking at Home.” As they point out, fluoride is “neurotoxic and potentially tumorigenic if swallowed; the American Dental Association advises that children under 2 not use fluoride toothpaste.” Of course that is far from the whole story, but it does seem that awareness of the serious risks of fluoridated water has built considerably.
The same issue of Time Magazine also has an article called “Flushed Away” about how many drugs are ending up in our water supply.
But is may be some time yet before most municipalities remove fluoride from your water supply. This issue has been fought for decades now, and the those who do not want to remove fluoride still have the upper hand. There have even been a couple of US cities that recently started to add fluoride, although others recently dropped it.
To read more about water purification, click on Water Filter Pitcher.
Yes, fluoride likely is good for teeth; particularly with topical application. The benefits of fluoride have been widely touted for decades. There are also many millions of people in the country who would like to remove fluoride from our water supply. We have uncounted hundreds, maybe thousands, of customers with conditions that are caused or aggravated by fluoride – and we are just one small company. These include some who were overfluoridated and became bedridden – and had to fight to regain a normal life. This was achieved when they did all they could to eliminate fluoride intake. (All the while being told they were idiots to even consider fluoride as the cause.) We hear regularly from many with thyroid conditions, sent by their healthcare practitioners, who simply cannot be drinking it. Those with kidney disease are at high risk from fluoride ingestion. Do you care at all about the millions of people of people in the country that fluoride hurts? Do you even have any idea that they exist? The list goes on, and learning about it is easily accomplished if one had any inclination. Are you interested in the public’s health – or just teeth? We need to remove fluoride from the water supply.
There is a growing body of research that identifies clear risks for fluoride ingestion. Individuals may reach different conclusions about whether adding fluoride to the water supply is a good idea or not. But it’s interesting how many people who favor fluoridation in the public water supply just immediately move into rudeness and personal attack. That some individuals – and municipalities – have an opinion different than yours does not make them foolish, uninformed or unethical. Is that really the best you can do – just hurl accusations?
Do you also tell your patients that in 2006 the American Dental Association notified its members that ingestion of fluoride is dangerous for children under the age of one? (Later that caution seems to have been raised to under 2.) Do you tell your older patients that it is likely that fluoride delivers no benefits for them? Are you aware that people now intake considerable fluoride from food and drinks in addition to toothpaste and water? Have you considered that therefore the statement that fluoride is at safe levels in the water supply is completely out of context and ignores other sources? Do you actually think fluoride is good – even for teeth – regardless of the level of intake? I suspect that you don’t know these things – otherwise you would at least be able to consider that someone might reasonable want to reduce their fluoride intake.
There are many medications that can deliver some positive benefits. Shall we also put them into the water supply whether you want or need them? Or should we do what many European countries have done for decades and make other sources of fluoride readily available? Dental health in those countries has improved as much as in the US.
I’m not sure why I’ve bothered responding, and while of course you may respond as you wish, I won’t continue the exchange. I guess the one point that I’d humbly suggest to you as a doctor is that you might learn if your patients have a health condition that is harmed by fluoride ingestion, and consider that before you increase their exposure to it.
Why we should remove fluoride from the water supply
Although many people have believed for a long time that fluoride in our drinking water was good for our dental health, there have now been many studies that demonstrate that there are significant risks of fluoride in drinking water. These present many excellent reasons why we should remove fluoride from our drinking water.
Our kids have fewer cavities than we did, and we’re credit that to fluoride in the water supply. However, many European countries outlawed fluoride in drinking water decades ago and their dental health has improved as much as in the US, in some areas more. To ascribe all of our dental health improvements to fluoride in the water doesn’t hold up. Some in favor of fluoridation endlessly argue that there is no science to say it is bad for us. This is simply not true.
Nearly always the argument for adding fluoride to drinking water is that it is in a dosage that is safe and even good for us. But drinking water is not the only way we ingest fluoride – so isolating one source and saying the level is okay is absurd. More and more the original untested assumption that fluoride in water would help with dental health is being confronted.
Medicine in the Water
Another issue is do you really want ‘medicine’ delivered through your drinking water? Our view is that we should each have the right to determine what medicines we intake – or don’t.
Fluoride doesn’t just break down and disappear. It accumulates over time. An NRDC study says people today ingest 4 times as much as they were when they started putting fluoride in our drinking water! This is pretty evenly spread across intake from water, other drinks, food and dental products. If you did everything you could think of to avoid fluoride, you couldn’t eliminate it! Cut back on fluoride when you can. You’ll still get lots!
There are many risks that have been identified from the intake of fluoride.
Studies Showing Fluoride Risk: Reasons to Remove Fluoride
Children’s brain development came to the forefront as a concern after three 2007 medical studies suggested that fluoride may have a detrimental effect on childhood IQ. Several studies published in 2007 showed shortcomings in previous research studies. A Mexican study linked high-fluoride (5 ppm) in water to reduced IQ by controlling other key factors by multiple regression analysis. The study also eliminated bias by assuring that the psychologist conducting the IQ tests did not know which of the children had high fluoride exposure. According to the authors, exposure to fluoride was associated with reduced Performance, Verbal and Full IQ scores. The individual effect of fluoride in urine indicated that for each mg increase, a decrease of 1.7 points in Full IQ might be expected.
While the levels at which problems were identified will lead some pro-fluoride folks to conclude this and similar studies should be ignored, remember: Water is by no means the only source of fluoride. It can be argued how much fluoride we intake from various sources, but there ARE various sources and there is extraordinarily hard to manage levels of intake. (Municipalities add in the area of 1 ppm.) Additionally, consider that individual sensitivities vary. There are serious risks to drinking fluoride from our water supply.
Proponents of fluoride in the water supply frequently say that there is no science to prove fluoride in the water supply is dangerous. While the use of the word ‘prove’ may make that statement narrowly correct, the fact is there are many many scientific studies indicating severe risks. Every year there are more studies showing fluoride risks, some of them from very low dosages. Studies showing benefits of fluoridated water have been questioned for their scientific validity. Our view is that common sense suggests we should remove fluoride from our drinking water. And of course, the studies suggesting benefits from drinking fluoridated water also don’t prove that the view they support is right.
Why should it have to be proven that fluoride in the water is dangerous? The opposite should be true: Something should only be added to the water supply if it can be proven to not be dangerous. And that cannot be proven regarding fluoride.
We all like to point to studies that support our views. But let’s also consider that science is an exploration – and does not provide the ‘final answer’. Things change. Research includes different variables. We recall being told that asbestos was safe – and that cigarettes were good for you. At some point you have to make up your own mind. And you should not be forced to ingest something you don’t want to ingest.
People Injured by Fluoride – and Concerned about Fluoride: Diseases Impacted by Fluoride
Here at friendsofwater.com we hear from many many people who cannot drink the water in their own home, or in a restaurant or public place. We’ve heard from people who have been over-fluoridated and if they drink fluoridated water become desparately ill. These people are of every age and both genders. There have been moms hugely concerned because their children – who get sick if they ingest fluoride – were about to go to college. At home they had water filters; what could they do at school? Recently we’ve heard most often from people with thyroid disease who can’t drink fluoride or their condition worsens. They have been told by their health care practicioners to remove fluoride from their water. Some people have allergies to fluoride – we just heard from a mom whose 7-year old son is allergic to allergies.
Here are a couple of excerpts from an article about fluoride and thyroid:
“Then we discovered that the original research intended to support the initial addition of fluoride into drinking water, was flawed. For example, in 1945, the US Public Health Service began to add sodium fluoride into the municipal drinking water of Grand Rapids, MI, the first city in the US to fluoridate. Grand Rapids was supposed to serve as the test city. Its dental decay rates were to be compared with those of Muskegon, MI, which was non-fluoridated. After ten years, it was to be determined if fluoride was both safe and effective.
“Amazingly, this “research” was to be performed on an entire city, rather than using a voluntary sampling group initially. More strange was that long before the study was completed, the Public Health Service and the American Dental Association endorsed fluoridation. This was in 1950, only a few years into the supposed ten-year study. WIthin a short time after that, Muskegon, the control city, was also fluoridated. The decision and the endorsements entirely overshadowed the fact that the tooth decay rate in non-fluoridated Muskegon had decreased about as much as the fluoridated city, Grand Rapids.
“Not only was the science incomplete, but in addition, sodium fluoride was soon replaced by another fluoride substance, hydrofluosilicic acid, a byproduct of the phosphate fertilizer industry primarily, and also from some aluminum plants.”
We also hear from people sent by their cancer clinics where they were told “You must stop drinking this poison.” Some who talk to us are just extremely sensitive, and react badly to fluoride. Some have immune difficiencies and are damaged by fluoride. Some have reported they experience what looks and feels like rhumatoid arthritis from exposure to fluoride. We know people who became bedridden from exposure to fluoride.
If fluoride is added to our water for health reasons – why is the reality of these people’s lives ignored? Likely that is because if you actually look at the reality you can’t sustain your support of fluoridation. Who could deny the personal experience of so many? Remove fluoride from your drinking water!
Water & Toothpaste Are Not the Only Sources of Fluoride
We have yet to hear one proponent of water fluoridation address the issue that fluoride is found not only in the water supply and that means we are intaking more than what they claim is a safe level. But fluoride is found in produce, in most foods now that have water in them, and in toothpaste. There is lots of fluoride in canned foods, like soup for example. There is a lot in soda cans. How can they continue to look at one source only and say the level of fluoride is safe? This is patently absurd! It is apparently easier to throw around words like ‘hysterical’, ‘paranoid’ and ‘fear-mongering’ than it is to acually consider that water fluoridation is causing suffering for many people.
It’s not easy to test fluoride levels at home. One customer paid the $380 needed to get a good fluoride tester. Among all the many places he found significant levels of fluoride was in the vegetables in his home-grown ‘organic’ vegetable garden. He realized that he is watering it with fluoridated water and the plants pull it right in. The levels vary in different vegetables, but in some like tomatoes it is quite high. (He also reported 0 fluoride after water was filtered by our 2-canister FLUORIDE PLUS filter, and 0 fluoride after 6 months of use.)
We recognize that many proponents of fluoridating the water supply are sincere people interested in the dental health of others, particularly poorer people. And there are some studies that indicate such benefits exist. But several European countries outlawed fluoridated water decades ago. Some of them fluoridate salt. Solutions are available that allow those whose bodies cannot tolerate fluoride to readily avoid it.
It’s time to stop putting medicine in the water.
Other resources:
Green Waste Removal Guide: Responsible Disposal & Pickup Tips
Tree Removal Cost Sydney: 2026 Price Guide, Factors & Environmental Impact
